2 00 3 Ultrafilters with property ( s )
نویسنده
چکیده
A set X ⊆ 2 has property (s) (Marczewski (Szpilrajn)) iff for every perfect set P ⊆ 2 there exists a perfect set Q ⊆ P such that Q ⊆ X or Q∩X = ∅. Suppose U is a nonprincipal ultrafilter on ω. It is not difficult to see that if U is preserved by Sacks forcing, i.e., it generates an ultrafilter in the generic extension after forcing with the partial order of perfect sets, then U has property (s) in the ground model. It is known that selective ultrafilters or even P-points are preserved by Sacks forcing. On the other hand (answering a question raised by Hrusak) we show that assuming CH (or more generally MA) there exists an ultrafilter U with property (s) such that U does not generate an ultrafilter in any extension which adds a new subset of ω. It is a well known classical result due to Sierpinski (see [1]) that a nonprincipal ultrafilter U on ω when considered as a subset of P (ω) = 2 cannot have the property of Baire or be Lebesgue measurable. Here we identify 2 and P (ω) by identifying a subset of ω with its characteristic function. Another very weak regularity property is property (s) of Marczewski (see Miller [7]). A set of reals X ⊆ 2 has property (s) iff for every perfect set P there exists a subperfect set Q ⊆ P such that either Q ⊆ X or Q ∩X = ∅. Here by perfect we mean homeomorphic to 2. It is natural to ask: Question. (Steprans) Can a nonprincipal ultrafilter U have property (s)? If U is an ultrafilter in a model of set theory V and W ⊇ V is another model of set theory then we say U generates an ultrafilter in W if for every z ∈ P (ω) ∩W there exists x ∈ U with x ⊆ z or x ∩ z = ∅. This means that the filter generated by U (i.e. closing under supersets) is an ultrafilter in W . We begin with the following result: Thanks to the Fields Institute, Toronto for their support during the time these results were proved and to Juris Steprans for helpful conversations and thanks to Boise State University for support during the time this paper was written. Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 03E35; 03E17; 03E50
منابع مشابه
Reasonable Ultrafilters, Again
We continue investigations of reasonable ultrafilters on uncount-able cardinals defined in Shelah [8]. We introduce stronger properties of ul-trafilters and we show that those properties may be handled in λ–support iterations of reasonably bounding forcing notions. We use this to show that consistently there are reasonable ultrafilters on an inaccessible cardinal λ with generating system of siz...
متن کاملThe Topology of Ultrafilters as Subspaces of the Cantor Set and Other Topics
In the first part of this thesis (Chapter 1), we will identify ultrafilters on ω with subspaces of 2 through characteristic functions, and study their topological properties. More precisely, let P be one of the following topological properties. • P = being completely Baire. • P = countable dense homogeneity. • P = every closed subset has the perfect set property. We will show that, under Martin...
متن کاملUltrafilters with property (s)
A set X ⊆ 2 has property (s) (Marczewski (Szpilrajn)) iff for every perfect set P ⊆ 2 there exists a perfect set Q ⊆ P such that Q ⊆ X or Q∩X = ∅. Suppose U is a nonprincipal ultrafilter on ω. It is not difficult to see that if U is preserved by Sacks forcing, i.e., it generates an ultrafilter in the generic extension after forcing with the partial order of perfect sets, then U has property (s)...
متن کاملUltrafilters, monotone functions and pseudocompactness
In this article we, given a free ultrafilter p on ω, consider the following classes of ultrafilters: (1) T (p) the set of ultrafilters Rudin-Keisler equivalent to p, (2) S(p) = {q ∈ ω∗ : ∃ f ∈ ω, strictly increasing, such that q = f β(p)}, (3) I (p) the set of strong Rudin-Blass predecessors of p, (4) R(p) the set of ultrafilters equivalent to p in the strong Rudin-Blass order, (5) PRB(p) the s...
متن کاملTopology Proceedings 34 (2009) pp. 27--37: Remarks on the Generic Existence of Ultrafilters on $\omega$
The purpose of this note is to contrast the generic existence of certain kinds of ultrafilters on ω with the existence of 2-many of them. First, we prove that it is consistent with ZFC that there are 2-many Q-points but Q-points do not exist generically. This answers in the negative a question by R. Michael Canjar. Then we define the strong generic existence of a class of ultrafilters and show ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003